Courses / TrainingStudy space

Welcome to your study space

Understand economics at your own pace: step-by-step guided courses, and exercises to practice.

🎓 47 guided courses🎯 10 exercise types🪜 7 steps per course
student
🔭

The three approaches to GDP

Three routes through the accounts, one and the same result.

🎓 Intermediate⏱️ 14 min
Output = Expenditure = Income
Step 1 / 7

Problem / motivation

What if three accountants, starting from completely different data, always landed on the same GDP?

That is exactly what national accounting guarantees — the accounts of the entire country, kept by INSEE, France's national statistics institute, according to common rules: it records who produces, who buys, who collects, and derives GDP from it — the value of everything the country produced new over the period (the course “GDP” builds it step by step). Output, expenditure and income are three ways of looking at the same money.

Before we go in, two business words worth knowing — they carry the whole course. TURNOVER is everything a firm invoices its customers. VALUE ADDED is what it actually created: its sales MINUS what it bought from other firms. A baker who sells €100 of bread after buying €70 of flour has not created €100 of value: he added €30. (This is what gives VAT its name — value added tax: at each link, the tax falls only on the value that link adds.)

One last marker: a product bought to be transformed or resold (the baker's flour) is called INTERMEDIATE; a product bought to be used as it is (your loaf) is called FINAL. Keep these words to hand — the poll turns on them.

A baker sells €100 of bread, after buying €70 of flour from the miller. What should be counted in GDP on the baker's account?

Step 2 / 7

Assumptions

In your view, which assumptions are needed for this model to hold? Jot down your ideas — no lead is wrong, this is your worksheet.

Your worksheet is still empty. Go for it: propose at least one idea.

0 idea(s) proposed
Step 3 / 7

Formalization

Look first at ONE single sale. A loaf goes for €100 (a very big loaf — we are keeping round numbers). That sum is three things AT ONCE: output (from wheat to bread, firms created it), expenditure (the customer paid it), and income (it ends up entirely in pockets — wages, production taxes, profits). GDP merely generalises: add up all the final sales in the country, and the same total reads through what is created, through who pays for it, or through who collects it. The identity is no miracle: it is the same money, looked at three times.

We add up value added — for each producer: its sales, plus whatever enters inventory (assumption 3), minus its purchases from other firms (its “intermediate consumption”, as INSEE calls it). Why not turnover? Because the baker's flour already lives inside the miller's: turnovers overlap, value added never does. (A word of rigour: everything is counted NET OF TAX. The VAT paid by the final customer enters nobody's value added — INSEE adds it separately, right at the end, to get back to GDP at the prices actually paid. Above all, hold on to the idea: each value is counted only once.)

Open up a firm's value added: it splits entirely into three. The wages of those who work there; production taxes — the taxes you pay by the very fact of producing, such as property tax on the workshop (nothing to do with corporation tax, levied afterwards on profit); and all the rest: profit — which is also where the pay of a craftsman who draws no wage sits. (National accountants call it “gross operating surplus” for a company — and “mixed income” for a self-employed person, in whom it blends labour and capital. Hold on to “profit”.) Summing these three incomes across the whole country therefore gives back, necessarily, the sum of value added — this is assumption 4 turned into a formula.

Four possible customers, not one more: households (C, for Consumption — all of us, when we buy in order to live), firms (I, for Investment — machines, buildings… and inventories, where the unsold goods of assumption 3 land), the government (G, for Government — its purchases and the wages of its staff, NOT pensions or benefits: there it redistributes, it buys nothing), and abroad (X, for eXports). One single adjustment: C, I and G contain imported products, made elsewhere — so we take out iMports, hence the “X − M” (the course “GDP” goes through each letter). And the identity reads both ways: it lets you recover a missing piece, and serves as a safety rail — two routes that diverge mean an error somewhere. Click each angle of view:

= =

Tap a term in the formula to see its definition.

Step 4 / 7

Solving / calculation

Let's take the bread chain again — farmer → miller → baker — this time with the prices on display. Compute each value added, then check the three approaches on the same €100.

  1. The farmer sells his wheat for €40 (he buys nothing from anyone)VA = 40 − 0€40
  2. The miller buys the wheat for €40, sells his flour for €70VA = 70 − 40€30
  3. The baker buys the flour for €70, sells his bread for €100VA = 100 − 70€30
  4. OUTPUT: we sum value added40 + 30 + 30= €100 — the price of the final good
  5. The trap avoided: summing turnovers40 + 70 + 100 = €210wheat counted 3 times, flour twice — wrong
  6. EXPENDITURE and INCOME, on the same loafthe customer pays €100; the note trickles down (the baker settles his flour at €70, the miller his wheat at €40) and each link pays wages and taxes then keeps its profit, on ITS value added — added up: wages 55 + production taxes 5 + profits 40= €100: triple identity verified

Three routes, one number: €100. Output creates it, expenditure pays for it, income distributes it — and the “210” shows what double counting would have inflated.

Live calculationVA = selling price − purchases

Move the selling PRICES: value added shifts from one link to another, but their sum depends only on the final price. Compare it with the sum of turnovers.

VA: farmer + miller + baker40 + 30 + 30 €
Sum of value added (= GDP of the chain)100 €
Sum of turnovers (the trap)210 €
Step 5 / 7

Economic interpretation

This triple identity is not just an accounting curiosity: it is the framework of all economic statistics — provided you read it properly.

Three views, three questions

Output tells you WHO CREATES the value (industry? services?), expenditure tells you WHAT DRIVES activity (consumption? exports?), income tells you HOW IT IS SHARED (labour, capital, the state).

A safety rail

The three approaches rest on different sources (company filings, household surveys, customs data…): if the totals diverge, one source has an error or a blind spot — and the institute reconciles them (cf. the limits).

True for the whole, not for each of us

The identity does not say that YOU spend all your income — you can save. It says that at country level, everything produced finds a taker, even if the firm has to “buy” its unsold goods by putting them into inventory (assumption 3).

The real figures (France, 2024)

In INSEE's 2024 national accounts, the three columns land on the same total: 2,919.9 €bn (rounded figures below). OUTPUT: 2,611 of value added + 309 of net taxes on products (the “net of tax” point from the formalisation). EXPENDITURE: 2,301 of final consumption — households and public administrations together, the C and the G of the course — + 628 of investment + 990 of exports − 999 of imports. INCOME: 1,503 of wages + 1,027 of profits (gross operating surplus and mixed income) + 390 of net production taxes. INSEE bases its computation on output first; the other two columns serve as cross-checks.

Step 6 / 7

Limits / critiques

Step 7 / 7

Exercises

1

One production chain has three links, whose value added is €50, €20 and €35. What GDP does the output approach give (in €)?

3

True or false: adding up the turnover of every firm gives GDP.

5

In a simplified economy: wages 900 €bn, profits 450 €bn, production taxes (net of subsidies) 150 €bn. What GDP does the income approach give (in €bn)?

€bn
7

A final good sells for €240. Its production chain has three links: the first creates €90 of value added, the second €70. What is the third one's value added (in €)?

9

A miniature country: firm A sells €60 of components to firm B — and nothing else — then B sells €150 of finished objects to households. What is this country's GDP (in €)?

2

A joinery invoices €8,000 of jobs this month, after buying €3,000 of timber and hardware. What is its value added (in €)?

4

Which approach corresponds to C + I + G + (X − M)?

6

A firm generates €5,000 of value added: €3,200 go out in wages and €300 in production taxes. What is its profit (in €)?

8

The expenditure approach gives 2,050 €bn, the output approach 2,000 €bn. What does a national accountant conclude?