Intermarket Analysis
Intermarket analysis studies the relationships between four major asset classes -- stocks, bonds, commodities, and currencies -- to identify leading indicators and confirm trends. Developed primarily by John Murphy, it bridges the gap between technical analysis and macroeconomics.
Last updated: 29 July 2026
Prerequisites
PrerequisitesThis is the most advanced sheet in the technical analysis track. It requires a solid grasp of everything before it: trends (ch. 2), moving averages (ch. 5), oscillators (ch. 7) and volume (ch. 8). It also assumes a basic knowledge of bond, commodity and currency markets.
Definition
DefinitionMurphy developed the concept of intermarket analysis in Intermarket Technical Analysis: Trading Strategies for the Global Stock, Bond, Commodity, and Currency Markets (1991). In the second edition (Intermarket Analysis: Profiting from Global Market Relationships, 2004) he updated his models after the upheavals of 2000-2003; the central contribution of that edition is the deflationary scenario described in the key points.
The underlying idea is simple but powerful: no market moves in isolation. Equities, bonds, commodities and currencies are bound together by economic and psychological relationships. A move in one market has inevitable repercussions in the others. Understanding these interdependencies allows reversals to be anticipated before they become visible in any single market.
Murphy identifies a typical intermarket cycle that has repeated for decades: it begins with commodities (the inflation signal), spreads to bonds (rates respond to inflation), then to equities (the cost of capital affects valuations), with the dollar amplifying or dampening these moves.
Why it matters
Murphy presents intermarket analysis as the missing complement to classical technical analysis, which studies each market on its own. An analyst who watches a single market is like a physician examining a single organ: the most important signals may pass unnoticed. Financial markets form an interconnected ecosystem in which every variable influences the others.
Intermarket correlations carry considerable predictive value because markets do not all react at the same time to a change in conditions. Commodities often respond first to inflationary pressure, bonds next, then equities with a lag of several months. That staggering in time is what lets the intermarket analyst anticipate a reversal in one market by watching what is happening in another.
Key points
Murphy's model identifies a typical chain of reaction in an inflationary phase: (1) commodities rise (the inflation signal), (2) bond yields rise (markets anticipate higher policy rates), (3) bond prices fall (the inverse yield/price relationship), (4) equities eventually correct (a higher cost of capital weighs on valuations, and tightening credit slows the economy)
The deflationary scenario — the central contribution of the 2004 edition — inverts that reading: when the dominant threat becomes deflation, as in 2000-2003, rising bonds stop being bullish for equities. Capital flees equities into bonds, the two markets decouple, and the stock/bond correlation turns negative
The dollar/commodity correlation is among the most stable and exploitable. A strong dollar penalises commodities, gold and emerging markets; a weak dollar favours them. Murphy recommends always checking the dollar's trend before taking a position in commodities or emerging markets
Gold holds a unique position in Murphy's intermarket model: it is at once a commodity (inversely correlated with the dollar) and a safe haven (positively correlated with uncertainty). In a crisis, gold can decouple temporarily from industrial commodities
Murphy insists that correlations change over time. The stock/bond correlation moved from positive (before 2000) to frequently negative (after 2000, under deflationary fear and then low rates) — before returning to positive territory in 2022, when inflation became the dominant variable again. The intermarket analyst has to reassess the validity of his models regularly
Concrete example
ExamplesThe 2021-2022 episode illustrates Murphy's intermarket model — provided it is read in two stages, because commodities play two successive roles in it.
Phase 1 (2021): commodities give the signal. Prices surge through the year (WTI crude moves from roughly $48 to $75 a barrel, the CRB index gains nearly 40%) while US inflation climbs from 1.4% to 7%. In line with the chain described in the key points, bonds react next: long yields rise in waves from 2021 onward, the Bloomberg US Aggregate ends the year already in the red, and in late November the Fed drops the word "transitory".
Phase 2 (2022): tightening changes the roles. The S&P 500 peaks as early as 3 January — so the bond signal's real lead time was measured in weeks to a few months, not quarters; reading bonds still had value after the peak, since the equity decline ran on until October (−25% at the low). The Fed raises rates by 425 basis points over the year, the US 10-year goes from 1.5% to 4.2% at the October peak, and the Bloomberg US Aggregate posts one of the worst years in its history (−13%). The dollar soars (DXY up 19% at the September peak, +8% on the year) and commodities then switch sides: the inflation signal of 2021 becomes the dollar's victim — crude falls back to around $80 after its March peak at $130, copper loses 13% on the year, emerging markets (MSCI EM) 20%. Gold, for its part, finishes almost unchanged (~$1,829 → $1,824, −0.3%): holding its ground against a dollar that strong is the demonstration of the dual nature described in the key points — a commodity penalised by the greenback, but a haven sought out amid uncertainty.
The model's sequence — commodities, then bonds, then equities, with the dollar as amplifier — did play out, but spread across two years rather than in a single cascade. What remains is the instructive anomaly of 2022: equities (S&P 500 −19%) and bonds fell together. That positive correlation breaks with the "frequently negative" regime installed after 2000 — it is, for the duration of an inflation shock, a return to the regime that prevailed before 2000 (see the vocabulary: positive correlation from 1960 to 1997). The lesson is Murphy's own: correlations depend on the dominant regime. Under deflation (2000-2003), bonds rise when equities fall — the decoupling described in the key points; under inflation (2022), the same variable, interest rates, strikes both markets at once, and equities and bonds move together again.
Common mistakes
CautionWatching one market in isolation. Murphy hammers the point: before buying equities, check the trend in bonds and in the dollar. Before buying gold, check the dollar. Before buying emerging markets, check the dollar and commodities
Treating correlations as immutable physical laws. Murphy warns that correlations can break temporarily, during liquidity crises or shifts in monetary regime. The analyst has to distinguish the stable correlations (dollar/commodities) from the variable ones (equities/bonds)
Confusing correlation with causation. Two markets moving together does not mean one causes the other's move. Both may be responding to a common third factor, such as Fed policy
Ignoring regime changes. Murphy notes that zero-rate policy (2009-2021) and quantitative easing temporarily disturbed the traditional correlations. The exit from that regime in 2022 confirmed it in reverse: the return of inflation brought the stock/bond correlation back into positive territory, the territory of pre-2000 (see the example)
Practical note
MurphyMurphy treats intermarket analysis as the final stage in the training of a complete technical analyst, and his substantive recommendation is never to analyse one market without watching the other three asset classes. A modern application of his method: build a daily dashboard containing the S&P 500 (equities), TLT (long-term bonds), DXY (dollar), GLD (gold), the CRB Index (commodities) and the VIX (volatility). That precise list is not Murphy's — the TLT (2002) and GLD (late 2004) ETFs postdate or coincide with his books — but the spirit is his: like a pilot sweeping the instrument panel, an analyst who reviews these six dials each morning gets an overview of the forces in play before zooming in on any individual market.
📊 Analyse Intermarchés — Cycle de Murphy
Market impact
MarketsIntermarket analysis is used daily by fund managers for both strategic and tactical asset allocation. Intermarket correlations sit at the heart of the risk models of the large financial institutions (BlackRock, PIMCO, Bridgewater). In 2022, the chain from inflation to rates to bonds to equities described the massive rotation out of growth stocks — the most rate-sensitive — into value and income names. Global macro hedge funds (Bridgewater, Soros Fund Management) have reasoned in intermarket terms since the 1970s and 1980s, well before Murphy's books, starting from macroeconomics; they use the same relationships Murphy codified for technical analysts, and the lineage runs in that direction, not the other.